iPhone app displays realtime nuclear radiation readings from around the world
Mainstream radio engineering principles hold that the received signal strength of a transmission is proportional to the radiated power. Doubling the transmitter power produces twice the received power, quadrupling the transmitter power produces four times the received power, twice the received voltage, which is 6 dB or one S unit. This has been accepted for over a century.
However, recent experimental results, first reported on the FRN and later in The Journal of Irreproducible Results cast doubt in this basic radio engineering theory.
These results claim that as the transmitter power is reduced to very low levels, the received signal strength actually goes up, not down.
A transmitter location on the east coast of the USA was used. The tests were conducted on HF radio frequencies on and around 6925 kHz, using a state of the art solid state transmitter with a standard off the shelf MOSFET as the RF final amp:
Each monitoring post was equipped with the highest quality HF receiving gear and highly sensitive monopole receiving antennas.
During the trials, it was found that placing a non-conductive fabric, such as a sock, over the receiver produced the strongest signals. While the exact mechanism for this effect is not yet known, it is presumed to be due to the high dielectric constant of the fabric.
The results of the experiment clearly speak for themselves, as transmitter power went down, the signal strength went up:
One way to explain the results is to return to the luminiferous ether theory of radio propagation. Radio waves are propagated by vibrations in the ether. Fewer radio waves means that there is more ether per radio wave, so the vibrations are larger, producing a stronger signal at the receiving site.
There were even reports of radio propagation that cannot be explained by any known laws of physics, such as signals in the daytime traversing from Montana to New Zealand on 6955 khz with a completely sunlit path, even though D layer absorption would make this completely impossible. Yet this was reported many times by longtime radio physicist Dr. Winston: “The signals were always received with as SIO of 555. Even the audio quality was perfect, why it sounded like I was listening to it live in the studio!”.
Several times signals were actually received and logged on the FRN before the transmission began. This suggests that superluminal neutrinos may be involved.
Further research into this new phenomena is required. If homeopathic radio is ever perfected, it would allow listeners to report hearing transmissions that used little, or theoretically even no power. Indeed, reducing the output power to zero watts might produce the best results of all for this type of station.
Is that Channel Z’s transmitter?
Happy April Fool To You Too.
I have designed a new pirate radio transmitter, out of an old chewing tobacco tin and empty chewing gum wrappers. Should be an improvement over the Grenade, if I can find the right kind of sock to wrap it in…
LMAO! No wonder you guys got him so riled up.. I just found this today